RL Vision Knowledge Base
Support questions and answers for software by RL Vision.
Note: This is an archived discussion. Any bug, problem or suggestion mentioned here is likely to have been fixed since it was written.
Subject: Re: Flash Renamer 6.2
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:27:22 +0200> I’ve noticed when switching from renaming files to folders or vice versa…
> that the active directory path is lost and I receive a message saying the
> pathing is now invalid.
Can you tell me exactly what you need to do to reproduce this, because I can't get this to happen. A screenshot or two might help too.
// Dan
Guy wrote:
>
> Hi been a while…anyways new bug report.
>
>
>
> I’ve noticed when switching from renaming files to folders or vice versa…that the active directory path is lost and I receive a message saying the pathing is now invalid.
>
>
>
> I had another two bug reports…but one I think is my fault…after looking through the settings…and another I can’t seem to recall at the moment.
>
>
>
> Anyways if you could fix up the issue where pathing becomes lost it would be very helpful. :)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Guy
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4350 (20090820) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
> that the active directory path is lost and I receive a message saying the
> pathing is now invalid.
Can you tell me exactly what you need to do to reproduce this, because I can't get this to happen. A screenshot or two might help too.
// Dan
Guy wrote:
>
> Hi been a while…anyways new bug report.
>
>
>
> I’ve noticed when switching from renaming files to folders or vice versa…that the active directory path is lost and I receive a message saying the pathing is now invalid.
>
>
>
> I had another two bug reports…but one I think is my fault…after looking through the settings…and another I can’t seem to recall at the moment.
>
>
>
> Anyways if you could fix up the issue where pathing becomes lost it would be very helpful. :)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Guy
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4350 (20090820) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com